🔗 Share this article

Across several weeks, intimidating messages persisted. Initially, reportedly from an ex-law enforcement official and a former defense officer, later from law enforcement directly. In the end, Mohammad Khurshid Shaikh claims he was summoned to the local precinct and told clearly: keep quiet or experience severe repercussions.

Shaikh is one of many opposing a high-value initiative where this historic settlement – an iconic Mumbai neighborhood – will be bulldozed and modernized by a corporate giant.

"The unique ecosystem of the slum is exceptional in the world," says Shaikh. "But their intention is to dismantle our social fabric and prevent our protests."

Contrasting Realities

The dank gullies of the slum stand in sharp opposition to the soaring skyscrapers and luxury apartments that dominate the settlement. Residences are built haphazardly and frequently without proper sanitation, small-scale operations release harmful emissions and the air is permeated by the overpowering odor of exposed drainage.

For certain residents, the promise of Dharavi transformed into a modern district of premium apartments, well-maintained green spaces, modern retail complexes and residences with proper sanitation is an aspirational dream achieved.

"There's no proper healthcare, paved pathways or water management and there are no spaces for kids to enjoy," states A Selvin Nadar, 56, who moved from Tamil Nadu in that period. "The single option is to tear it all down and build us new homes."

Community Resistance

But others, like this protester, are fighting against the redevelopment.

None deny that this community, historically ignored as an illegal encroachment, is urgently needing financial support and improvement. However they are concerned that this project – lacking community input – is one that will convert premium city property into an elite enclave, evicting the lower-caste, immigrant populations who have been there since the late 1800s.

It was these marginalized, relocated individuals who established the empty marshland into a frequently examined example of self-reliance and economic productivity, whose production is worth between a significant amount and $2m a year, making it a major unofficial markets.

Resettlement Issues

Among approximately one million inhabitants living in the crowded 2.2 square kilometer neighborhood, a minority will be able for alternative accommodation in the redevelopment, which is estimated to take a significant period to accomplish. Additional residents will be moved to wastelands and coastal regions on the far outskirts of Mumbai, threatening to break up a historic neighborhood. A portion will be denied residences at all.

Residents permitted to continue living in the area will be allocated units in tower blocks, a significant rupture from the evolved, communal way of living and working that has supported this area for so long.

Commercial activities from garment work to clay work and waste processing are likely to reduce in scale and be moved to a specific "commercial zone" far from homes.

Livelihood Crisis

For residents like Shaikh, a craftsman and multi-generational resident to call home the slum, the project presents a fundamental risk. His informal, multi-level facility produces leather coats – sharp blazers, luxury coats, decorated jackets – sold in luxury boutiques in south Mumbai and abroad.

His family lives in the rooms downstairs and employees and sewers – migrants from north India – reside on-site, enabling him to manage costs. Beyond the slum, housing costs are typically 10 times more expensive for minimal space.

Harassment and Intimidation

In the official facilities in the vicinity, a conceptual model of the redevelopment plan illustrates a contrasting perspective. Fashionable people move around on bicycles and electric vehicles, acquiring western-style bread and pastries and enlisting beverages on an outdoor area near a coffee shop and Ice-Cream. This depicts a world away from the affordable idli sambar first meal and budget beverage that maintains local residents.

"This isn't development for residents," explains Shaikh. "It represents an enormous land development that will render it impossible for our community to continue."

Additionally, there exists concern of the corporate group. Run by a prominent businessman – one of India's most powerful and a supporter of the national leader – the conglomerate has been subject to claims of favoritism and questionable practices, which it disputes.

While the state government calls it a joint project, the corporation contributed $950m for its controlling interest. Legal proceedings alleging that the redevelopment was unfairly awarded to the corporation is being considered in India's supreme court.

Ongoing Pressure

After they started to publicly resist the redevelopment, protesters and community members state they have been subjected to an extended period of coercion and warning – comprising communications, explicit warnings and implications that opposing the initiative was tantamount to speaking against the country – by figures they claim work for the corporate group.

Included in these accused of delivering warnings is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c